<?xml encoding="ISO-8859-1" version="1.0"?>
<!-- OPML generated by OPML Editor v0.75 on 5/19/2013; 6:14:16 PM -->
<opml version="2.0">
	<head>
		<title>Why amateur reviewers are better</title>
		<ownerName></ownerName>
		<ownerEmail></ownerEmail>
		<windowTop>200</windowTop>
		<windowLeft>200</windowLeft>
		<windowBottom>600</windowBottom>
		<windowRight>800</windowRight>
		</head>
	<body>
		<outline created="Thu, 17 May 2012 14:16:49 GMT" pgfnum="9785" text="1. Amateurs don't have relationships with the vendors to protect. "></outline>
		<outline created="Thu, 17 May 2012 14:19:58 GMT" pgfnum="9786" text="2. The reviews don't all come the week before the product is announced. "></outline>
		<outline created="Thu, 17 May 2012 14:20:03 GMT" pgfnum="9787" text="3. They aren't rehashes of press releases. "></outline>
		<outline created="Thu, 17 May 2012 14:20:09 GMT" pgfnum="9788" text="4. They reflect actual experience using the product, over a period of weeks instead of minutes, in the case of some professional reviews. "></outline>
		</body>
	</opml>
